PHILOSOPHY
OF EDUCATION
PART
ONE: INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY AND
EDUCATION
PHILOSOPHY
The term philosophy is derived from two Greek words
‘philein’ meaning love, to strive after, to search for; and ‘sophia’ meaning
wisdom. Philosophy thus involves a search for wisdom by a philosopher.
Philosophers take nothing for granted: not even themselves or their wisdom: as
such they are constantly searching for answers and are concerned with the
meaning and significance of life. This search can make them a nuisance to
everyone e.g. Socrates spent most of his time in the streets of Athens going
round discussing with people, taking nothing for granted and questioning
everything e.g. what is good, what is true, what is beautiful, what is courage,
justice democracy. He considered his task similar to that of a midwife and a
sculptor: to bring to birth a new idea, and to create new things, new knowledge
respectively. Eventually people in the state of Athens grew tired of him and
put him to death.
Doing philosophy (in the wider sense) includes any
serious attempt by people to arrive at an answer or response to the basic
questions of human life. A philosopher is anyone who shows concern and takes
nothing for granted: instead, he searches and searches hoping thereby to arrive
at a tentative (unsure/provisional) answer, a typical human response. The term ‘philosophy’ when used in its
singular form refers to process or activity involving philosophical thinking.
In its plural form, ‘Philosophies’ points to a product i.e. the outcome of the
philosophical process. Philosophical thinking produces a philosophical thought.
The philosopher’s world is very curious and odd because it consists of two
worlds: the wide world of general philosophy and the smaller world of
philosophers.
General
Philosophy: A Wide World
The beginning of philosophy coincides with the
beginnings of man; homo sapiens (sapiens
means wise, a word often used to refer to a philosopher. Philosophy is both
particular and universal i.e. it varies from time to time (traditional or
modern), from place to place (European, African, Asian etc). Particular means that, a human being
facing different situations in different places at different times is likely to
respond differently to these situations. Universality of philosophy means that
philosophy as a human response can be found in every period of history in every
culture/society on earth. Doing philosophy is not a preoccupation of scholars
only but all humanity because they all question their humanity, human condition and experiences of
life. Africans expressing their traditional thought through stories, riddles
and proverbs is as much part of philosophy as books by renown philosophers e.g.
Plato in The Republic
One’s philosophy of life e.g. to be a farmer,
teacher, carpenter etc is as much philosophy as national philosophies e.g.
Kenya’s Nyayo Philosophy, Tanzania’s Ujamaa. All these belong to the wide
word of general philosophy because they
express man’s response to life though quite varied and with limitations. A
thought is considered philosophical in
character because of its authenticity of thought. The term authenticity comes from Greek
‘authentes’ meaning one who does things himself (autos). It thus implies
thinking that is independent, genuine, original, critical and sincere giving a
personal answer to a personal question through a personal struggle. People
however call such thinkers mwalimu, guru, sage but reserve the term philosopher
for recognized academic scholars mostly of Western or European origin.
Technical
Philosophy (A Small World)
This is referred to as formal/academic philosophy.
In this sense, it is an academic discipline comprising of specialized content,
methods and specialists known as philosophers. In a technical sense, philosophy
refers to process and product. As a process, it refers to the activity of
vigorous thinking concerning perplexing questions/issues of life. Product
refers to the outcome of such thinking i.e. established systems of thought,
views and ideas. Technical philosophy applies to few people; individuals who
are committed to scrutinizing issues, problems going beyond the surface common
sense aspects to their logical composition. This small world has evolved from
the large world of philosophy characterized by the following factors:
(i)
Formalization
·
It is a process whereby a definite form
is given to a variety of human activities; form refers to the presence of a
structure, pattern or system. Formalization in our context in philosophy refers
to formalization of thought.
·
Initially, philosophy consisted of the
general amorphous sense. With the advent of writing, the various philosophical
thought began to be expressed in a more definite, systematic and lasting form.
·
Today the world of technical philosophy
is a world of books, scholarly writings, formal language and systematic thought
because it is an exclusive domain for academic scholars leaving no room for
oral traditions of the past and common philosophies of life.
·
Writing also allowed for debate and as
long as debate continued, philosophy continued to thrive.
(ii)
Westernization
·
Western civilization has greatly
influenced the field of learning to an extent that philosophy is attributed to
Western philosophers.
·
It is believed that philosophy
originated from ancient Greece and was further developed in Europe and America.
Philosophy is closely associated with Western civilization to an extend that
anyone interested in it must be familiar with the various systems like realism
(emphasizes that there is a world of real existence which exists
independently of human mind), idealism
(stresses the idea that reality is an expression of the mind: knowledge is
based on recognition/remembrance of latent/inborn ideas already present in the mind), pragmatism
(views reality as a changing phenomenon: man sees reality differently as he
interacts with it), as well as the philosophical language that is associated
with it.
·
As a result of this, Western philosophy
is assumed to be the standard of technical philosophy. For instance, ancient Egypt
played a very big role in the field of learning such as medicine and
philosophy. Ancient Greece and anyone who had studied in Egypt was highly
regarded as an authority.
(iii)
Specialization
·
Refers to the acquisition of exceptional
knowledge of, or skills in a given discipline/subject as a result of constant
and intensive study.
·
In ancient Greece, a philosopher was a
scholar who specialized in the exploration of the nature of man and the world.
The knowledge was not dichotomized into rational and empirical domains. A
philosopher was thus a Master of Arts and Science.
·
Due to westernization, western
specialists started at one time to dominate the field of formal philosophy and
subsequently imposed their language, interests and methods upon others making
formal philosophy highly technical and a matter for experts; always within the
Western context.
·
Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher
wrote widely on ethics, politics, fine art, logic, biology and physics.
·
Philosophy was referred to as the mother
of all sciences, the most distinguished science ‘scientia eminentia’. With the
advent of scientific evolution, the empirical sciences were detached from
philosophy. Later on, other disciplines like sociology, psychology and
anthropology developed as independent disciplines from philosophy. These
developments led to a situation where
philosophy acquired its own methods, content and terminologies.
A student of
education does not require technical philosophy specialization but an
introduction in order to understand the meaning and significance of educational
philosophy as an academic discipline.
Revision
questions
1
What
do you understand by the term philosophy?
2
Distinguish
between technical and general philosophy.
3
Why
is the world of technical philosophy a domain for a few?
CONTENT OF TECHNICAL PHILOSOPHY
This philosophy is concerned with four main areas
namely; logic, epistemology, axiology and metaphysics. These are called the
branches of philosophy.
1
Logic
It refers to the study of correct reasoning. It
deals with the structure and principles of sound arguments. On our daily basis,
individuals are engaged in various forms of arguments, where premises/statements
are made and conclusions drawn. In most cases, wrong conclusions are arrived at
involving wrong premises and undue generalizations. Logic is essential because
it stipulates how arguments should be constructed and how fallacies (erroneous
beliefs or myths) can be detected and avoided. Within logic, two forms of
reasoning can be distinguished: deductive
and inductive.
(a) Deductive reasoning
This involves reasoning from general to particular
instances. In this case, a conclusion is inferred or deduced from general premises/statements/propositions. For
example:
(i)
All PGDE students are untrained teachers
John
is a PGDE student
John
is an untrained teacher
(ii)
All human beings are liable to make
mistakes
Mike
is a human being
Mike
makes mistakes
(iii)
All human beings have sinned and fallen
short of the glory of God
Mary
is a human being
Mary
has sinned and fallen short of the glory of God
Further examples:
·
Private schools perform well in national
exams
·
All Kikuyus are thieves
·
All university students are immoral
The above reasoning has been expressed in syllogism
form: the first two statements need to
be stated before the third can follow logically. This type of reasoning is
prevalent in philosophy, religion and mathematics.
(ii) Inductive
reasoning
It involves general laws/conclusions being inferred
from particular instances. It is the reverse of deductive reasoning. In this
type of reasoning, various instances of a given specimen are observed over a
period of time. The observation leads to general conclusions/laws being
established. This type of reasoning is applicable with empirical sciences. In
modern philosophy, logic is expressed in two main dimensions:
·
Symbolic logic involving mathematical
symbols – application of symbols to explain phenomena eg a + b = 4: b= 4 – a
·
Analytic logic – prevalently used by
analytic philosophers who emphasise the logical analysis of language to arrive
at clear meanings of terms/concepts.
Students studying science, arts or education should
be familiar with the basic rules of logic so as to enable one reason correctly
and use language meaningfully.
2
Epistemology
This is the philosophical study of knowledge.
Epistemology is derived from two Greek words: episteme (knowledge) and logia (study).
It deals with philosophical reflection on issues related to knowledge.
Epistemology does not deal with factual knowledge such as that which
socio-sciences are involved. empirical sciences like Psychology and sociology
study issues by describing in a factual manner what they have observed about
human knowledge e.g. in cognitive development, a Psychologist will talk about
how it differs in relation to age, individual and the society. The philosopher
on the other hand will not inform on
facts and try to justify; instead, he will think before and after the scientist
does his work thereby challenging the scientist. Epistemology distinguishes
clearly between rationalism (which stresses the role of intellect in knowledge
acquisition) and empiricism (pays attention to sense experience).
It studies
the nature, sources and validity of knowledge. It seeks to answer questions
like:
·
What is knowledge?
·
How do we know?
·
What is truth?
·
What can we really know/
·
What does it mean to say that I know
something?
·
What are the sources of knowledge?
3
Axiology
It is the philosophical/rational study of values.
The term is derived from Greek words logia (study) and axia (values). It is
subdivided into the following sub branches:
(a) Ethics
or moral philosophy – reflects on the origin and nature of moral values:
meaning of what is right and wrong.
(b) Aesthetics
– philosophical study of artistic values. Interested in meaning of beauty, art.
(c) Social
and cultural philosophy – study of values related to societies and cultures
(d) Political
philosophy – deals with study of politics, governance etc.
The philosophical study of values is restricted to
the prescriptive domains. Values fall under three categories:
·
Objective – values considered to be
universal e.g. good, truth, beauty, freedom, love.
·
Relative – values that depends on
personal preference.
·
Hierarchical – ordering values from the
least desirable to the most desirable.
Philosophical reflection on values becomes necessary
when people are no longer certain about what is important, worthwhile valuable
for one’s life. It’s applied when people are faced with conflicting moral
standards or confronted with radically opposed ideologies that call for the
need for one to think about the foundation of morality and the society.
Ethics/moral philosophy have a great link with education.
4
Metaphysics
This term refers to what goes beyond (meta) physics,
beyond the study nature. It is the study of matter and its relationship with energy.
It deals with questions, things or concerns that lie after or beyond the
physical world of sense experience. Traditionally, it is subdivided into four
areas:
·
Cosmology:
the study of the universe (cosmos). It has to do with the origin and nature meaning
of the universe. This is done rationally.
·
Theodicy:
rational investigation of the supernatural. It belongs to the field of theology
where religious concepts and beliefs are assessed.
·
Ontology:
the philosophical study of ‘being’. What is the meaning of existence? What
comprises matter? What is man/woman? What is the essence of being?
·
Rational
or philosophical psychology: philosophy of the
mind. It investigates into the intricate processes of perceiving, imagining,
remembering, feeling, understanding, willing. It attempts to solve the mind/body
problem; their composition, nature and relationship e.g. can mind survive
destruction of the body?
Revision
questions
1
To
what extent are the contents of philosophy relevant to education?
2
Why
is it important for teachers to grasp a clear understanding of logic?
Methods
of Technical Philosophy
1
Critical
Method
The term ‘critical’ is derived from a Greek verb
Krincin meaning to judge. It involves subjecting of values, facts, principles,
conversations and assumptions; usually taken for granted to severe questioning.
This is meant to encourage honesty of thought. It seeks to protect man from
fanaticism and hypocrisy, intolerance and dogmatism, slogans and ideologies in
order to liberate man from narrow mindedness. This method is also called the
Socratic method. It is liberating and constructive in the sense that it seeks
to evaluate, to judge things in the light of clear and distinct ideas.
2
The
Rational Method
It emphasized the need for logical and systematic
thinking. Its greatly interested in logic being the art of correct reasoning.
It consists of analysis and synthesis. Analysis method has to do with breaking issued into
parts and by the power of systematic and logical thinking in order to arrive at
a clear understanding. Such thinking must not be haphazard or confusing; it
should be clear making the necessary distinctions separating clearly what is
essential, what matters from what is accidental and of less importance. It classified as primarily analytical
thinking because it cuts an issue into parts, analyses concepts and statements.
In addition, the method seeks to analyse concepts, statements and the language
used in different contexts in order to
clarify and justify meanings. Philosophical
synthesis has to do with putting together the various parts of an idea to form
a whole. It is used to complement philosophical analysis. Where else analysis breaks an issue into small parts, synthesis
brings together the parts. The aim is to see something in its totality, see the
inter-relationship and the overall framework. The limitation with the rational
method is its sole reliance on mind as the source of knowledge neglecting
ordinary sense experiences. Rationalists are thus regarded as idealists who do
not live in the real world.
3
Phenomenological
Method
The term phenomenology originated from the Greek
word ‘phenmenon’ meaning appearance and logia meaning knowledge. It designates
the description or study of appearance especially if the appearances are
sustained and penetrating. It is considers the actual staring point of
investigation to be the actual things as they appear, in their essential
reality through experience. Things will appear different from one person to
another. A philosopher’s concern is not the differences but to discover the
underlying meaning and thus arrive at a deeper understanding of phenomena. By
reflecting on an everyday human experience e.g. Of pain, joy, fear,
frustration, a philosopher is able to explain the experience in concrete terms
indicating in which manner the experience affects one’s life, whole being or
existence. It involves a non-biased, non-prejudiced stance in examining
phenomenon. Here, preconceived theoretical speculations are abandoned.
4
The
Speculative Method
Also called the metaphysical function. To speculate
is to make an intelligent/rational guess. It endeavors to challenge the human
mind as far as possible, to its ultimate limits in trying to understand what is apparently
incomprehensible. Man is not satisfied with knowing what happens to him, he
also wants to know why. Basic issues of concern in life include; death,
suffering happiness. There is no simple answer and many people explain or
clarify them in religious terms believing religion will give the final answer. Philosophers however prefer to explain these
issues by use of human reason; they want to challenge the human mind as far as
possible in trying to understand the incomprehensible. Speculation is very well
utilized in a research hypothesis.
Revision
question
To
what extent are methods of philosophy relevant to the teaching and learning processes.
THE
CONCEPT OF EDUCTION
It is very complex and thus cannot be defined simple terms due to its diverse shades of
meaning. It also applies to diverse activities and processes. Most definitions
of education are descriptive in nature. As such, they do not capture a single
idea but a family of ideas. The meaning of the word education can be accessed
from a number of perspectives
(a) Descriptive Definition
This is the meaning as offered in a dictionary. The
meaning is descriptive in nature and
inadequate because it tends to be general and vague e.g. the Fontana dictionary
defines educating as:
·
Passing on a cultural heritage
·
Initiation of the young into worthwhile
ways of thinking and doing.
·
Fostering of an individual’s growth.
This definition is limited because it does not
explain the cardinal factors requisite in the process of educating namely
that which has to do with transmission i.e.
how does one do it? Which component of cultural heritage is worth of education?
(b)
Prescriptive/Normative
Definition
This perspective tends to be biased depending on the
thinkers/theorists involved for instance: Plato defined education in the laws
as training, Comenius defined is as the art of teaching all men all things, Milton
defines it as the art of knowing everything while Lodge defines it as
equivalent to experience i.e. the experience of man interacting with his/her
normal environment.
(c)
Etymological
Definition
Etymology is the study of the origin of terms/words.
Accordingly, education is said to be derived from the Latin verb educare. In the ancient Rome, the verb
referred to the general process of growing up, of rearing, of bringing up.
Originally, it designated both the rearing of plants, animals and the bringing
up of children. Based on this definition, education has come to be viewed as
the art of molding, of giving form to an incomplete or delicate person i.e.
child. It presupposes the role of an adult molding the character, mind and
psychomotor of the learner. Other scholars trace the origin of the term
education to a Latin word ‘educare’ meaning to lead out or to bring out. In
other words, the adult assists the child to come of age and realize his
potential without any shade of coercion. The assumption is that the child is in
possession of abilities/potential awaiting to be elicited by proper guidance.
The more we pursue the definition of the concept of
education along the foregoing paths, the more complex it becomes. Realizing
this, analytic philosophers have suggested necessary conditions or criteria of
education. According to R S Peters (1966) in Ethics and Education:
·
Education must involve the transmission
of what is worthwhile, valuable or desirable. This is called the ‘desirability
condition’ of education.
·
Education must involve knowledge and
understanding, and some kind of cognitive perspective. This is called the
knowledge condition of education.
·
Education rules out certain procedures
of transmission that lacks willingness and voluntaries on the part of the
learner. This is the procedural condition of education.
Other philosophers, particularly Njoroge and Bennars
in Theory and Practice of Education
(1994) have reflected on these criteria and proposed four criteria or dimensions
of education.
(a) Education must involve the development of
knowledge and understanding (The knowledge/Cognitive condition). Any
reference to education presupposes the acquisition of knowledge – facts, skills,
ideas, principles e.t.c. It involves
intellectual activities like thinking, judging, reasoning, perceiving, deciding
e.t.c. If an activity does not involve
intellectual process then education cannot be said to have taken place. It
involves abstraction, discrimination, intuition and imagination.
(b)
Education should involve the development
of
individuality (the Creative/skill condition). Education should
encourage the development of individual unique capacities. Education should
make the individual creative rather than a docile recipient of knowledge should
make one a tool – user rather that make one a tool. Education should encourage
self- esteem, self–reliance, self–determination, self–expression and individual
growth. Education that places emphasis on knowledge only may produce a
person who is too academic but lacking social training (well educated).
Whenever people see unbecoming behaviour, the question becomes: ‘where did you
go to school? This is because schools are expected to make one social. Besides being academically endowed, an
educated person should actively participate as a creative agent.
(c)
Education should involve Socialization
(The Normative Condition): Education takes place in a social setting and
serves social functions. Education as Socialization is the acquisition of
Knowledge, values, attitudes, skills to make learners acceptable members of
society. These values and skills are passed from one generation to the
next. The aims (objectives), content and
methods of education are socially determined. The norms and values transmitted
ought to address the mind/the understanding level as opposed to mere habit
formation.
(d)
Education should involve dialogue:
Education is essentially a process of communication between the learner and the
environment as well as between the learner and teacher. Education as dialogue
encourages mutual respect, understanding, free debate and co-operation between
learner and teacher. Methods that hinder free and active participation of both
teacher and learners negate proper education. The methods should
neither be too permissive nor too authoritarian.
Revision
questions
1
Analyse
education according to either Njoroge and Bennars OR R S Peters and show its
relevance to the teacher.
2
Discuss
critically the concept of education and its relevance to a secondary school
teacher.
THE
CONCEPT OF TEACHING
Teaching may refer to three aspects.
·
An occupation or a profession.
·
Normal activity of a teacher in a
classroom or school situation (enterprise).
·
Describing an actual teaching exercise.
(a)
Teaching
as a profession
This entails the following:
·
An occupation by which a living is
earned.
·
Deeper commitment.
·
Long duration of preparation/training.
·
Formal induction and acceptance.
·
Standard of performance or competence.
·
Code of regulations, ethics or practice
to preserve the honor and prestige of the profession.
·
Willingness to advance the growth and
effectiveness.
·
Regulate scheme of payment and
remuneration.
·
A great regard for the interest or advantage
of the client.
(b)
Teaching
as an enterprise
It refers to the cluster of activities that the
teacher engages in within the school setting:
·
Marking registers.
·
Checking noise or maintaining
discipline.
·
Filling mark books.
·
Coordinating co-curricular activities.
·
Being on duty (TOD).
(c)
Actual
teaching
Simply defined as a system of actions intended to
induce learning. Must meet the following criteria:
·
Have a person who is consciously and
deliberately doing the teaching.
·
Another person or oneself who is being
taught – learner is logically necessary.
·
Something (content) being taught (facts,
information, knowledge, skills).
·
At least an intention on the part of the
person doing the act that the recipient should learn.
·
Involve methods or procedures that are
orally and pedagogically sound or acceptable.
According to William
Frankena (1973), education is said to take place when
“X is fostering or seeking to foster in Y
some disposition. D by method M.” Where
Ø X is the society,
the teacher or whoever is educating (even oneself)
Ø Y
is the leaner (child youth or adult)
Ø D
is disposition beliefs, habit, knowledge, skills, attitudes considered
desirable both for the leaner and society.
Ø M is morally
acceptable methods that pay attention to the interest of the learner, personal
integrity and active participation in the learning process. (Methods should not
dehumanize or degrade the learner.)
Revision
question
What
does the teaching concept entail? Why should a teacher have a clear
understanding of this concept?
EDUCATIONAL
THOUGHT IN AFRICA
This can be classified into various categories:
I Traditional
·
The African traditional/indigenous
education.
·
The Islamic tradition in education
·
The Western tradition in education
II Contemporary
(a)
Conservatism
·
Colonial view of education
·
The religious view of education
·
The nationalist view of education
(b)
Progressivism
·
the liberal view to education
·
the radical view to education
·
the instrumental view to education
(I)
TRADITIONAL
THOUGHT: THE AFRICAN INDIGENOUS EDUCATIONAL THOUGHT
According to J P Ocitti (1973), African indigenous
educational thought comprised of the following philosophical principles:
·
communalism
·
preparationalism
·
functionalism
·
perenialism
·
whotisticism
(a)
Communalism
It is derived from the adjective communal
originating from the Latin word ‘communis’ meaning belonging equally to two or
more people. It refers to a condition where people are united, cohesive, cooperative,
and are committed to the welfare of the
group as opposed to individualism. In practice, the principle of communalism
was expressed through the socialization of children as opposed to
individualization. Education was aimed at strengthening the organization, unity
of the clan, community and chief-dom. Overall, cooperation was preferred to
competition enabling the children to grow up seeing their well being in terms
of the welfare of the group.
Relevance
to contemporary education
·
Unity and cooperation are desirable
virtues which modern education ought to inculcate in the learners. Education
policy makers should do away with parochial/narrow minded extension of the society as a whole.
·
Teaching of social education and ethics,
history, literature as instruments to this endeavor.
Limitations
·
Communalism’s emphasis on the organic
whole of the community denies the human person the freedom to exercise unique
potential, and to aspire to become rather than conform.
·
Unity of purpose, theory and action in
inhibitive to creativity. It negates the need to establish unity in diversity.
(b)
Preparationalism
Derived from the noun preparation which stems from Latin
word ‘prepare’ meaning to make ready. It entails the process of making someone
ready or suitable for a certain purpose. In the African indigenous society,
children were prepared to become useful members of the society. They were
expected to become well adjusted with certain values, ideas, modes of behaviour
and attitudes in their adult life particularly as married men and women.
Relevance
·
It is imperative for education to equip
individuals with the capacity to cope with the physical, social and perhaps
spiritual environment. The content, methods and overall aims of education ought
to prepare someone to become a useful member of the society.
·
Modern education has relegated this
aspect to training colleges and universities which caters for a negligible
percentage of learners.
Limitations
·
Over
emphasis on the outcome/preparation can easily overlook the process
value of education. Each piece of knowledge, skill and general attitude ought
to be useful.
(c)
Functionalism
Function is Latin
word meaning action or activity proper to anything. It also refers to the
ability to function or to be useful in practical terms. Indigenous education
emphasized this principle by ensuring that every learning experience was
useful. Children were inducted into the society through participatory learning.
They were involved in work, ceremonies, rituals, imitation play, hunting and oral
literature. Practical learning was highly valued.
Relevance
·
The utility value of learning experience
is a positive approach to education. In other words, education is of use to the
society.
·
Learning by participation can encourage
production in society. Instead of confining the youth and energetic adults to
institutions of learning and exposing them to theories, they should work as
they learn.
·
The principle underscores the empirical
approach to learning which is a useful method of teaching and learning.
·
Creativity component of education is
essential.
(d)
Perenialism
The term emanates from the adjective perennial which
is from Latin ‘perenis’ meaning lasting throughout the year or a succession of
years. It designates a sense of permanence. Indigenous education was based on
the assumption that cultural heritage e.g.
language, food types, beliefs and traditions was essential for the survival of
the clan or tribe. The values, attitudes and practices contained in the common
heritage were considered established once and for all in the long distant past.
Succeeding generations were not allowed to change or modify it but had to
perform/observe it and hand it over.
Relevance
Historical study of the past is good so as to
appreciate and understand the milestones in the development and evolution of
ideas, knowledge and certain practices.
Limitation
·
It tends to overlook the learners.
Teaching based on perenialism is mainly teacher and content centered while
today’s teaching advocated for the learner centered approach.
·
Knowledge is pragmatic and keeps on
changing after every given period of time.
(e)
Wholisticism
It is derived from the adjective wholistic whose origin
is the word ‘hal’ an old English term meaning not divided into parts, complete
amount or a combination of parts. Indigenous education entailed a wide range of
skills, attitudes, values and knowledge. It was aimed at producing an all round
person equipped with a wide range of skills.
Relevance
·
Wholistic approach to learning is
important because it enables and individual to function in diverse situations.
The approach however encourages shallowness (jack of all trades and master of
none)
·
Specialization is essential for
innovation to be realized in the society.
Revision
question
Examine the relevance of philosophical
foundations of African indigenous education to the
8 4 4 system of education in Kenya.
(II)
CONTEMPORARY VIEW: NATIONALISM IDEAS IN EDUCATION
EDWARD
WILMOT BLYDEN (1832 -1932)
Born in West Indies in 1932, he migrated to Liberia
in 1851. He lived during a time when racism was at its peak. Africans were
considered backward and primitive. The Western education was widespread and its
major aim was to enable Africans to imbibe Western values ideas and worldviews.
His contemporaries reacted to the racial prejudices differently. Some were
persuaded to discard their cultures and absorb the Western culture wholesale
attaining what Frantz Fanon refers to as a “black skin, white mask”. The second
group attempted to integrate the Western values with African values i.e. they
discarded whatever was repugnant and adapted that which was useful. The third
category adopted a racial stance against the prevalent racial myths. They
tenaciously defended the Negro cultural heritage by dispelling the lingering
racial myths, and second by advancing unprejudiced racial theories. This
category of thinkers was equivalent of cultural nationalists. Blyden falls in
this category. His nationalist ideas included:
·
Defending the Negro race as a
distinctive race capable of playing its rightful role in the civilization of
humankind.
·
He opposed the inferiority complex exhibited
among Africans in their encounter with people of other races.
·
He painted to the fact that the Negro
race had played a significant role in the field of learning in the past and
could do so again if the right education was transmitted.
He thus advocated for:
·
A race-conscious-culture based type of
education i.e. a curriculum specially tailored towards the innate capacity and
the ultimate utility of race. This should be an education that will cause
Africans to discover themselves. Education in Africa should instill confidence
among Africans. It should restore human dignity and absolute confidence or
faith in one’s creative abilities. This call for authentic personality that
strives to dispel the lingering myth of European people being superior to the
Negro. He came up with the Philosophy of Afrikaners that sought to establish
how to make black people participate in the community of nations.
·
The development of the mind to be able
to subdue complicated phenomena. This would enable one to express themselves in
normative, rational and creative domains. Towards this, he advocated for the
education of girls and women in order to ensure rapid and permanent progress.
Revision
question
In
what ways are Blyden’s education ideas manifest in education in Kenya today?
(III)
PROGRESSIVIST PERSPECTIVE: LIBERAL VIEW TO EDUCATION
JULIUS
KAMBARAGE NYERERE
Born in 1922 in Musoma Tanzania, he obtained a
Diploma in education at Makerere College Uganda and later undertook a Master of
Arts Degree in Edinburg University in 1952. He became involved in the politics
of Tanzania when he returned home. He was a co-founder of TANU along with other
nationalists. During the first presidential elections in 1962, he was elected
the first president of post-colonial Tanzania. Besides politics, Nyerere
articulated his ideas in diverse spheres of knowledge including social
philosophy and education. In education, he advocated two related views namely:
education for self-reliance and education for liberation.
Education
for self reliance
The concept of self reliance comprises of two
distinctive words, ‘self’ and ‘reliance’. Self refers to the human person, the
agent or the ‘I’ of the individual. Reliance points to a state of being that
are dependent on something or somebody else. It refers to some bond or
relationship where subjects embrace in inter-subjective relationship viewed
together. Self reliance refers to a situation where the individual relies upon
himself/herself or his/her being. In a book called ‘education for self
reliance’ (1967), Nyerere underscored the need to radically examine education
in Tanzania. He diagnosed the major pitfalls of the inherited colonial
education in Tanzania as:
·
Education was founded upon the principle
of capitalism; it promoted a class of elites and inequality and class
structure.
·
It divorced its participants from
society and discouraged them from unconditional service to the community. They
want to live in towns.
·
It tended to be formal; book centered
and despised traditional informal knowledge and wisdom.
·
It tended to be unproductive,
discouraging students and pupils from hard work.
These factors were not in agreement with the past
independent Tanzania which basically embraced the philosophy of Ujamaa (African
Socialism). Ujamaa stood for:
·
Work by everyone and exploitation by
none.
·
Fair sharing of resources which are
jointly produced.
·
Equity and respect for human dignity.
·
Education for self reliance. It meant
the attainment of economic and cultural independence at a corporate level where
society could rely on itself for progress and development.
·
It also meant individuals expressing
themselves in creative, productive terms as a result of education.
Education
for liberation
The concept of liberation stands for:
·
Being freed from what appears
inhibiting/constraining.
·
Being freed to be able to undertake,
empowerment or freedom to become.
Education for liberation implied in Nyerere’s
context:
·
Removal of constraints and limitations
that stood in the way of Tanzanians to become self reliant: this is namely
colonialism and post colonial conditions that were in the interest of colonial
powers.
·
Liberation is not a once for all event:
it is an ongoing process involving systematic eradication o physical and mental
impediments to freedom.
·
Liberation is both physical and mental –
the total emancipation of man.
·
Education should release liberating
ideas and skills to the mind of learners. This is likely to increase control
over themselves, their lives and their environment
·
Education for liberation should employ
rational approaches to educating in the sense that educating should arose
curiosity and provoke inquiry.
·
The product of education for liberation
is likely to be a self reliant individual.
Revision
question
Critically
assess education for self reliance as articulated to Nyerere in relation to the
8 4 4 system of education in Kenya.
PART
TWO: PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
INTRODUCTION
It is the process and
outcome of philosophical thinking about education. It is an educational
discipline whose focus is the study of education/an area of specialization
within the study of education. It employs philosophical approaches in studying education.
It utilizes the content, methodology and to some extend the language of
philosophy in analyzing/dealing with educational issues. Philosophy of
education is an integral part of technical philosophy, equivalent to say
philosophy of science, law religion, mathematics etc. The philosophy of
education studies approach the study of/deals with educational ideas in
sociology, comparative, sociology of education etc while employing empirical
and inductive approach. As such, philosophy of education is essential to the
study of education in the following ways:
·
It provides room for a vision beyond the
empirical data of education i.e. seeks to explain what education is.
·
It tries to liberate those being
educated and their educators from their shortsightedness. It helps us to
enlarge our perception of education as well as for teaching.
·
It helps the student to think logically,
systematically, consistently and clearly about educational problems as well as life.
The teacher will learn the essence of clarifying meanings and justifying
statements.
·
It equips teachers with insight into the
whole purpose of teaching. Thus, it goes beyond knowledge of subject matter and
competence in teaching skills. Teachers ought to know what they are doing and
why they are doing it.
General
Philosophy of Education
This refers to the common sense notion of what education
ought to be. It refers to the personal view or attitude concerning the ideal
education. It refers also to the preferred slogans concerning education such as
‘education for self reliance, education for gender equity’ etc. In a school
setting, it refers to the school motto. In most cases, these philosophies are
varied, vague and are not based on systematic thought of what type of man they
want to produce. Education commission reports contain general philosophical
perspectives about education.
Technical
Philosophy of Education
Technical or professional philosophy of education
refers to the thorough and in-depth reflection on education. This is done using
philosophical methods, tools and techniques in investigating problems of formal
schooling. In this case, the process as well as the product amounts to
philosophy of education. This means that the process of asking questions and
criticizing issues in education as well as development of a clear statement of
a positive and more rational alternative in education comprises of philosophy
of education.
Technical philosophy of education is an integral
part of formal philosophy. It is the exclusive domain of professional
philosophers and of academic scholars concerned with the study of education. It
is basically/largely Western in orientation attributed to Western Thinkers and educationists
such as Comenius, Locke, Rousseau, Pestalozzi, Dewey etc.
(I)
EDUCATION
AND HUMAN KNOWLEDGE/THE COGNITIVE DIMENSION OF EDUCATION
Human knowledge falls within epistemology. Epistemology
deals with philosophical reflection of knowledge. It studies the nature,
sources and validity of the knowledge. It attempts to answer questions about
knowledge such as:
(a) What
is knowledge?
(b) What
is the nature of knowledge?
(c) What
are the principles of knowledge?
(d) What
is truth?
(e) How
do we come to know?
(f) How
can we verify knowledge?
(g) How
do we know that we know?
(h) What
can we really know?
(a)
What
is Knowledge
The concept of knowledge ‘to know’ can be
sub-divided into three aspects:
·
Knowing that – facts, information or
details about something.
·
Knowing how – having the ability to
demonstrate, possession of a skill or technique.
·
General familiarity – lack of sufficient
details.
The
Conditions of Knowledge
According to I. Scheffer (1965), there are three
conditions of knowledge:
1
Belief
Condition
Belief is a construction that something is as it is
stated. Anyone who makes a claim to knowledge must believe that it is so. He
must personally accent to the truthfulness of the claim. This involves the
conviction of the claimant. It is different from opinion (I think) which
implies doubt. Believing indicates certainty. To believe is however not to
know: it is just the beginning, more is required than mere belief. Believing is
more of a psychological state of mind and knowing is more than a strong
conviction. This is necessary for communication/teaching as it helps one to
demonstrate an element of originality.
2
Truth
Condition
It refers to the actual truth of what one asserts.
Knowing thus points to something independent of the individual claiming to know
– points to the truth of the matter. What one ‘believes’ may not be necessarily
the truth as it is universally known. To know is thus more than believing: it
implies that there is actually truth: a matter of true belief. To establish the
truthfulness of a proposition/statement, it must be subjected to the following
theories:
(a) Correspondence
theories of truth: whatever is claimed to be true must
correspond with reality i.e. must agree with what can be empirically verified,
measured, observed. The major impediment to this theory is that our
verification tools/observation are at times faulty. It is possible to perceive
reality wrongly.
(b) Coherence
theory of truth: whatever is claimed must cohere/agree
with what is already accepted/admitted as truth. Any new knowledge is validated
on the basis of the existing knowledge. However, this theory has limitations.
Whatever is known may be untrue or false, one could possibly be mistaken e.g.
the Galileo’s case with the Roman Catholic Church.
(c) Pragmatic
theory: whatever is of utility/value works and is useful or beneficial.
3
Justification/grounds
condition
The claimant must be able to cite evidence and
evidence of the right kind to support/justify his claim. Absolute certainty is
difficult to attain because human knowledge tends to be limited. Certainty thus
remains uncertain or hypothetical. One must always be prepared to review/reconsider
their knowledge in the light of new evidence though adequacy of evidence is
many times a serious problem. Although every claim to knowledge must be based
on some grounds, there are statements which do not necessarily require
evidence. E.g. analytic propositions that are self explanatory statements;
statements based on existential and consciousness i.e. I feel frustrated. While
we insist on evidence, we should exempt analytic proportions based on
existential realities.
Authority
as a Source of Knowledge
It refers to people or
individuals who occupy superior positions in relation to the claimant.
Knowledge is here based on what those in authority have said i.e. I know it
because so and so says so. People in authority include parents, teachers, preachers,
authors and journalists. Authority is simply believed. Individuals rely on
authority because they lack time to verify for themselves. Also, there tends to
be lack of commitment to question issues and search for clear knowledge. In a
classroom situation, students tend to believe wholesale whatever the teacher
says. There is therefore a need for care and concern for truth on the part of
the teacher.
Precautions
when dealing with authority:
·
The person whose statement we believe
must be a relevant authority in the field.
·
Authorities sometimes disagree. There is
need to be careful: sometimes judgment needs to be suspended before arriving at
a conclusion.
·
Verify information. Whenever we accept
the other people’s statements, we should establish whether they are actually
true.
No matter how reliable an authority is, it cannot be
the primary source of knowledge.
Human
Knowledge and Curriculum
Generally, curriculum refers to knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and skills
which are considered desirable for transmission to others. Knowledge is
classified or categorized within the curriculum based on certain criteria:
(i)
Language: each subject tends to have a
particular language e.g. maths -matrix, integral, numbers; religion – sin, grace, soul etc.
(ii)
Methods of verification or testing: e.g.
sciences depend on empirical observation and tests on experiments while
mathematics uses deductive reasoning.
(iii)
Area of specialization or subject
matter: physical sciences deals with natural world while social sciences
concentrates on the world of culture. Philosophy, religion and mathematics also
deals with distinct areas such as the world of numbers.
Based on the
above criteria, the following classifications of knowledge have been
enunciated:
1
Logic and mathematics.
2
Physical sciences.
3
Human sciences.
4
Aesthetics (e.g. fine arts)
5
Morality or ethics.
6
Philosophy.
In addition, philosophers have presented theories by
which a good curriculum ought to be assessed.
(a) The
utilitarian curriculum: This means the curriculum that is useful to the learner
and one conducive to human happiness i.e. promotes the greatest amount of
happiness for the largest possible number of people. Such a curriculum includes
survival skills, social skills, and politics.
(b) A
curriculum for rationality (thinking systematically): It has to produce a
rational mind. In order to cultivate
this certain subjects need to be incorporated i.e. logic, mathematics,
philosophy.
(c) A
heritage curriculum: The chief point of education is to bring children into
what exists as a public tradition of shared knowledge i.e. culture which refers
to the intellectual aesthetic, moral and material achievements of mankind.
Knowledge:
a Question of Depth
(a) Rational Belief: it
is the justified true belief i.e. a belief justified on rational grounds one
arrives at a rational belief by reasoning. This belief goes beyond logical
reasoning because it is more comprehensive. It is a matter of understanding.
Understanding involves insight and reflection. Insight is a moment of
intuition, of discovery, of seeing the point, of first awareness. After insight
one makes a claim which must be justified in a rational manner: by searching
for evidence. Reflection involves critical evaluation of the evidence for
verification in order to judge the truth of the claim or belief. Whereas
insight is like pure belief, reflection points to justified belief and
ultimately to justified true belief.
(b)
True
Belief: truth is the agreement/correspondence between
our thoughts and reality. A belief is called true if what one believes agrees
with the facts. To accept the truth of
an idea, it must be compared with the reality/with the real facts. These facts
can be established with reference to two theories of truth:
(i) Inter-subjectivity of truth: truth
is inter-personal; it is something shared by all of us and not purely an
individual affair. One can compare their understanding of truth with that of
others; if there is agreement one can conclude that their understanding is
correct/true. This knowledge is however hypothetical because things may change.
Scientists operate in this manner when testing their ideas.
(j)
Man’s
dialogue with reality: man gives meaning to things but
reality provides a man with meanings. Truth becomes evident when things uncover
themselves. The basic criterion of truth is therefore evidence gained by
observation and reflection. An object communicates its meaning when it is put
into use. The object itself provides the answer e.g. if there is a doubt on the
identity of a sharp object – if it’s a pencil or screw driver – the dispute is
put to rest by putting it into use: the evidence of what it is comes from the
way it works.
Revision
question
1
“Knowing
is justified true belief”. Discuss this statement showing how a clear
understanding of knowledge is useful to a practicing teacher.
2
To
what extent are theories of truth useful to school teachers?
(II)
EDUCATION
AND VALUES: THE NORMATIVE DIMENSION OF EDUCATION
Axiology is the philosophical study
of values. Normative definition defines a word in terms of what ought to or
should happen ideally speaking. The
definitions are in the area of values and ideals. Values are generally
categorized into two: ethical and aesthetic values. Whereas ethical values deal
with morality, aesthetic values are to do with beauty; harmony and uniformity.
The term value is a word that implies what is good or right, desirable or
worthwhile and what ought to be praiseworthy. Normative dimension of education
refers to norms or standards that are to be recommended for the educational
enterprise which in turn provide general guidelines for education theory and
practice. For example, Kenya consider education as an important vehicle for
attaining the eight goals as explained by the Kenya Institute of Education
(KIE, 2002):
1. To foster nationalism,
patriotism and promote national unity,
2. To promote the social
economic, technological and industrial needs for national development,
3. To promote individual
development and self fulfilment,
4. To promote sound moral and
religious values,
5. To promote social equality and
responsibility,
6. To promote respect for and
development of Kenya’s rich and varied cultures,
7. To promote international
consciousness and foster positive attitudes towards other nations,
8. To promote positive attitudes towards good health
and environmental protection.
Throughout history, the question ‘what kind of life is
good (how do l ought I to live)?’ has been raised. In answer to this question,
diverse answers have emerged:
·
A
good life ought to involve maximum pleasure.
·
A good life should include spiritual
contemplation.
·
A good life ought to be ascetic –
involve self denial and elimination of desires. Value is emphasized by a given
society. It affects not only the direction of morality but also the direction
of educational objectives and content.
ETHICS
The term ethics is derived from a Greek noun ‘ethos’
meaning:
·
The customs and conventions of a given
community. In this sense, ethics is synonymous with morality i.e. set of norms guiding
human conduct.
·
The study of morality in all its forms.
It is primarily an academic exercise, an intellectual pursuit, a process of
inquiry and reflection. Here, ethics refers to a process whose product becomes
morality and ethics.
·
Meta-ethics: it is concerned with the
meaning of moral concepts and statements as well as their justification. It
aims at clarifying such ambiguous words like good, bad, wrong and right.
Approaches
to the Study of Ethics
There are three approaches namely: Descriptive
ethics; Normative ethics and Analytical ethics:
I Descriptive
Ethics
This is a scientific study of ethics/morality. It
involves the observation of values and the reasons given for them. It refers to
the empirical or descriptive study of morality. Morality refers to a set of
norms or standards – transitional or otherwise – that defines, guides and
regulates good acceptable behaviour among human beings. Descriptive ethics is
characteristic of social sciences such as psychology, sociology and social
anthropology.
Examples of descriptive ethics
Kohlberg, a psychologist distinguished three levels
of moral development namely:
(a) Pre-conventional
stage: the child simply perceives right and wrong primarily in terms of reward
and punishment. This is a stage of naïve egocentrism. Rewarding encourages
repeat of certain behaviour. The problem with this level in the
teaching/learning process is the impact on those not rewarded; they tend to get
discouraged.
(b) Conventional
stage (of law and order). This is mainly between the ages of 10 and 13. At this
stage, the child begins to respond willingly to expectations in the family,
group and community. The child tends to seek approval from parents, teachers
and peers by conforming to the set social conventions. There is a tendency to
be loyal.
(c) Post-conventional
stage (moral autonomy): this ranges between 15 and 19 years. The young person
goes beyond the stage of law and order and seeks to develop own judgment on matters
of morality. The youth specifically tends to respect democratically determined
rules and laws. This stage leads to self determined moral principles and moral
autonomy.
Sources
of Morality
(a) Religion:
through divine revelation, religion offers a supernatural source of moral
standards. Such revelations are expressed in terms of laws and guidelines contained
in religious writings such as the bible, Koran etc. Faithfuls of such religions observe morality
because God commands it. These comprise what is called religious ethics.
(b) Society:
there are various social institutions in it e.g. family has parental authority,
clan has the authority of elders, the school and teachers authority, the peer
group and public opinion; and national laws are sources of morality. Social and
religious ethics comprise of moral standards which are external to the
individual person. In this case, the centre of moral authority lies outside the
individual; either the divine or human agents. Such ethics is called
heteronymous ethics.
(c) The
individual human person (autonomous): here, the source of morality is both
human reason and human conscience. In this case, somebody does something
because they believe it is right or wrong i.e. and individual lays down the
norm. The various sources of morality offer diverse moral guidelines and
principles/multiplicity of values.
II Normative Ethics
Ethics as the study of morality can be either
descriptive or normative. Normative is interested in the rules and norms of
society. It attempts to give fundamental reasons for values/morality.
Basically, it seeks to prescribe the ‘ought’ of values. Whereas descriptive
ethics is empirical in character and relies mainly on the social sciences,
normative ethics goes beyond mere descriptions. It is reflective in nature as
it seeks to inquire – rationally into the basic grounds of moral conduct and
theories to justify morality in a philosophical or theological manner. Morals
do not stand on their own; they are centrally located between principles and
values on the one hand and laws, rules and regulations on the other hand.
Normative ethics is primarily concerned with basics;
with moral principles and moral values which lay down norms for moral human
conduct/action. Moral or immoral action
is only a possibility with human beings. Animals and non humans are non moral.
·
An action is judged to be moral or
immoral when it is done voluntarily or intentionally. When a person is forced
to do something or accidentally does something or is in sane or mentally
damaged, such a person cannot be said to be morally responsible for the action.
·
The morality of an action is judged by
its effect on the basic direction of human existence. Human actions become
moral if and when they affect human relationships.
Morality
Principles
Morality refers generally to ‘doing the right
thing’. It implies action, behavior/conduct. Such action is considered right
(moral) when it is done in accordance with certain principles generally referred
to as theories of moral obligation. These theories provide a framework within which
to judge whether a certain action is morally right or wrong.
There are two theories of moral obligation:
teleological and deontological
(a)
Teleological
theories
They
judge a certain action to be good or bad, right or wrong depending on whether
the consequences of that action are desirable or not. One’s action is judged
based on the desirability of the goal. The term teleology is derived from and
ancient Greek word ‘telos’ meaning goal. On the question of whose ultimate or
good ought to be promoted, teleological theories render two distinctive views i.e.
·
Ethical universalism stresses the common
good or the general good of all.
·
Utilitarianism which coheres with
ethical universalism states that something is morally good if it is useful in
promoting good over evil; if it helps to bring about the greatest happiness of
the greatest number.
(b)
Deontological
theories
The
word deontology emanates from Greek word ‘Deon’ meaning duty. Deontological
theories emphasise duty meaning actions as judged to be rules, commandments
that prescribe one’s duty. Within the deontological theories, two views can be distinguished:
·
Rule deontology; it involves doing one’s
duty or obeying the stated rules, laws at all times.
·
Act deontology: this theory allows for
individual judgment on what to do and how to do certain actions. The rules and
the laws are considered as a general yardstick.
Morality
of Values
Theories of moral value concentrate on the agent
rather than the action on the person who acts. It emphasizes the inculcation of
values to the individual as necessary for moral actions in other words,
emphasis is on being and not necessarily doing. Moral philosophers have
identified cardinal virtues that ought to be inculcated namely prudence,
fortitude, temperance and justice.
·
Prudence; quality of being cautious and
wise in conduct: discreet wisdom applied to practice.
·
Fortitude: courage in endurance.
·
Temperance: moderation in the exercise
of natural appetites and passions.
·
Justice; quality of being fair,
integrity, impartiality, rightness and the awarding of what is due.
III Analytical
Ethics/Meta-Ethics
This is a more critical level of the study of
ethics. It goes beyond prescriptions and seeks deeper insights into the
justifications of morality/values. This approach to the study of ethics is at
the clarification of terms and statements that is the meaning of ethical terms
and statements as used in ethics, both in the ordinary and academic sense. It
is a form of linguistic analysis aimed at clarifying and validating. Advocates
of liberty and freedom oppose any form of externally imposed discipline. They
argue that:
·
A person must be in to some degree free
from external restraint.
·
A person must exercise freedom of
choice.
·
Discipline is only admissible if it
increases or widens or guarantees an individual great freedom of choice.
On
the other hand, proponents of externally imposed discipline argue that
discipline is justifiable or several reasons:
·
Restores and preserves the natural
authority of the teacher.
·
To minimize or prevent disorderly behaviour
which may interfere with the liberties and rights of others or even of their
own.
·
To help students/learners to be able to
choose for themselves and hopefully to choose to accept the laws.
PUNISHMENT
The
term punishment means the intentional and purposeful infliction of pain (of
some kind) by a person in authority as a penalty for what the authority
believes to be some wrong done by the offender. In a school, punishment may
take various forms; corporal punishment, withdrawal of privileges and, imposition
of sanctions and detentions.
Education
implies the transmitting of knowledge skills by one who is an authority to
those who are not. To enable this to take place, certain external conditions
must be applied. It is generally expected that the student must be reasonably
orderly and attentive, and the instructions of the teacher must be generally obeyed.
As such, the teacher ought to operate as an authority in what he teaches and function
in authority. The teacher is required to cultivate the right personality, have
mastery of his teaching content and be conversant with class management in
order to naturally elicit obedience and discipline in his learners. Whenever
his/her authority is challenged, he/she may have to resort to punishment. Punishment
would then be justified in the following ways:
i)
As a means of restoring the position
which existed before the offence took place.
ii) To
prevent a repetition of the offence.
iii) To
restore the teacher’s lost authority as a result of the learner’s disobedience.
iv) To cause the learner to learn something i.e.
obedience or learning the content as a result of punishment.
Philosophical Justification of
School Punishment
i)
Utilitarian
theory: according to this theory, punishment is justified
if it excludes a greater evil to the individual or society. In this case,
punishment is not an end in itself. It is viewed as a means to greater good. As
such, it is aimed at producing good results, fame of the school etc. although
punishment may look unpleasant, involving pain and humiliation; this is
temporary compared to the good which it is likely to produce. This theory
allows for pressure to be exerted on both the good (non offenders) and the
offenders alike as long as good results can be obtained.
ii)
Retributive
theory: it holds that wrong doing is blameworthy and that
some forms of wrong doing should not only be blamed but that blame should be
expressed through that infliction of pain. In this case, to punish is to repay
(restitute) the wrong done. It holds that an individual should suffer for his
mistake/offence. This view assumes that man is generally free and responsible
for his actions. As such, one can be rationally and logically held responsible
for wrongdoing. Punishment serves as a moral disapproval.
a. Retributive punishment should not be mistaken
with revenge. Such confusion usually unleashes terror and violence upon the
offender unproportionally.
b. The
retributionist hopes that punishment makes the offender feel, through his/her
suffering, the society’s vehement condemnation of his irresponsible act. It is
also hoped that through this, the offender may feel condemned, accept the
punishment as just, condemn himself in sorrow, repent and start on a voluntary
enterprise of self reform.
Criticism of the retributive theory
It
may lead to communication breakdown between the offender and the person
administering punishment i.e. when the offender feels that it is a personal
attack or revenge by the punisher. This is often the case where no explanations
are given before or after the act of punishment. It is impossible to inflict
pain that is proportional to the offence. The suffering of the injured party
cannot be given back to the offender in the same measure. The offender may
cultivate resentment. In place of the expected sorrow and repentance, one may
reserve anger and repetition. This theory therefore overlooks reassuring and
prudence. The offender may have wronged by mistake or ignorance.
iii)
Deterrent theory: deterrent punishment
aims at influencing people by some sort of fear so that they will not do/repeat
the wrong. The theory holds that: inflict pain on or after the occasion of
wrong doing. This will tend to condition the offender towards the avoidance of
the offence in future. Deterrent punishment is necessary in schools if social
order is to be maintained because:
·
It deters others from breaking rules.
·
It prevents others from a greater evil.
·
It reforms the culprit eliciting better
behaviour.
It is utilitarian
because it aims at correction as well as bringing about a good life. However,
only those who have willingly/voluntarily wronged should be punished. But those
who genuinely committed offences out of ignorance should be treated otherwise.
Deterrent punishment should aim at the understanding of the offender concerning
the offence i.e. society’s approval and the urgent need to reform. It is a form
of conditioning. In order to be administered effectively, the teacher should
understand its effectiveness in application to different personality types.
DISCIPLINE
The term discipline
originates from the Latin ‘discere’ meaning to learn or to conform to specific
order. The concept of discipline in education may be defined as a relationship
of submission or obedience to some sort of order. Discipline implies three
distinctive meanings:
·
The imposing by some persons on others
of restraints backed by sanctions of some kind. Here, it refers to external
control of a person’s restraint.
·
It may mean self-discipline that
consists of exercising one’s freedom of choice in which case one must be
reasonably free from external restraint.
·
It may mean the discipline that is
freely accepted when one decides to put oneself under an order of some kind
i.e. the order of religion or morality of an art or the discipline of an
academic subject. This advocates for liberty and freedom.
Revision
questions
1
Corporal
punishment is unacceptable in upholding discipline in schools in Kenya. Discuss
the rationale of this argument showing how discipline can best be cultivated in
schools.
2
Critique
the normative dimension of education in Kenya with reference to the national
goals of education.
3
How
can the theories of moral obligation be utilized to inculcate morality in
secondary schools in Kenya today?
(III)
EDUCATION
AND INDIVIDUAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CREATIVE
DIMENSION
OF EDUCATION
Introduction
Human
beings are unique. They are more than a material object at the mercy of
physical chemical forces and more than a sensitive animal controlled by
biological laws. He/she transcends the view that one is a mere product of
society or an outcome of political, economic forces. The human person is
endowed with ability to be actively involved in the world and be able to
control in a limited manner his own destiny or life.
Basically,
the human person comprises of four elements.
·
Ability to think, reason.
·
Human will – voluntary decision making
·
Ability to act.
·
Ability to relate with others –
socialize.
In
the process of education, the child is considered to be a potential human
being, a not yet human. Education thus serves the purpose of humanizing;
bringing the child into an actual being. It aims at influencing the child to
come of age, to reach adulthood. The task of education in this case is
two-fold:
(i)
The
individualization of man:
This involves a
process of humanization where limitations/ inhibitions to his/her potential are
deliberately removed or minimized. This is done by:
·
Inculcating rationality in the learner
to foster critical thinking ability to comprehend, justify and appropriately
apply acquired knowledge.
·
Transmission of morality, ethics to
enable the child attain moral judgement and moral behaviour.
·
Inculcating skills and know-how
(occupational capacities).
(ii)
The
socialization of man
Genuine humanization should enhance the social
dimension of man where one is able to mutually interact with others and
co-exist with them. By inference, we find the four dimensions of education
namely; cognitive, normative, creative and dialogical. Each of these dimensions
deserves attention in the process of education in order to realize genuine education.
In the final analysis, we may define education normatively as the ‘inter
subjective process of learning to be a self-reliant person in society’.
(a)
Education and Human Creativity
Creativity is the
capacity or ability of an individual to create, discover or produce a new or
novel idea or object including the rearrangement or reshaping of what is
already known to him which proves to be a unique personal experience. In
education, creativity refers to those aspects of education geared towards the
development of an individual’s potential. As a dimension of education, it
gained prominence with the rise of progressive movement in educational
thinking.
The progressive
movement arose from John Dewey’s educational ideas. He advocated for the child
to be allowed to grow in a natural way: not just physically but also mentally.
There should be no direct interference with this natural process: teachers and
educators should play the role of a ‘gardener’ providing the right environment
that stimulates the growth. His ideas were influenced by earlier philosophies
of Froebel (school = kindergarten) and Rousseau (educating Emile). Dewey
advocated for a revolution in theory and practice of education. Dewey opposed
the traditional authoritarian approach to education which regarded the teacher
as the sole authority in the classroom. Traditional approach forced pupils to
abide by a rigid system of rules and regulations for purposes of discipline and
character formation. In addition, it gave prominence to content of learning
where learners were expected to assimilate learning content in the given form.
According to Dewey,
this traditional approach violated the psychology of the child as well as the
wide idea of democracy. He advocated the view that true education can only be
found in ordinary experience as the individual interacts with his environment.
In this case, children can best effectively learn by exploring the environment
through inquiry and testing one’s ideas. Dewey equated education to the process
of growth whereby, an individual should learn independently through experience
to adjust to life. He advocated for child-centered education. This education
entails a shift from content-centered and teacher-centered traditional
approaches. In a nutshell, Dewey stressed the importance of experience and
growth of inquiry and freedom as well as creativity. Progressivists view
education as a process of helping a child to develop mentally, physically,
socially and emotionally. These levels of development are possible if the child
is allowed to grow naturally. This enables the child to express one’s potential and to creatively utilize these
talents. Emphasis in education is upon the individualization of the learner.
Operationalizing
Creativity in Education
Creativity refers to
the ability to bring about change, novelty and innovation in the way things are
perceived and done. It has to do with the natural inclination of an individual
to express himself reflectively and act accordingly. In other words, it has to
do with stirring individual’s innate abilities and causing the individual to
rationally apply them in the society. In order to ensure the component of
creativity in education, several aspects need attention. These include:
(i)
Child centered approach to education.
(ii)
Learning environment should be warm and
encouraging – free from intimidation/ coercion etc.
(iii)
Learner uniqueness ought to be
appreciated. Individual differences should be addressed in teaching and
learning.
(iv)
Teachers should display care and concern
towards learners – show understanding
(v)
Dialogue should be the routine in
educational communication.
(vi)
Teachers should fully grasp the essence
of the process of knowledge production and dissemination/transmission to
learners.
(vii)
Usually, knowledge tends to be
produced/manufactured outside the classroom. It’s not only contained in
textbooks.
(viii)
When it is transmitted in the class, it
is viewed as alien isolating the learner; it appears unrelated to the learning
environment and realities.
(ix)
Need to exercise these two moments
concurrently in the teaching/learning environment. Learners should feel that
they too could produce knowledge and know it at the same time.
(x)
Teaching methodology should involve
problematization of content towards which both teacher and learner approximate
by way of seeking for answers – task oriented learning.
(xi)
Content
presentation should not be portrayed as though the content is final. Teachers
should endeavor to relearn the content while learners learn the content the
first time.
(xii)
The teacher should encounter the learner
as equals in this shared humanity. The learner may look delicate, ignorant etc,
but the focus should be on what the learner is becoming.
(xiii)
Identify learner’s strengths and
weaknesses and be able to advice them appropriately in terms of careers,
talents etc.
(xiv)
The teachers’ role here is to guide,
train and elicit the inner capacities that often lie dormant/idle.
The importance of creativity in education is:
(i)
To develop individuality.
(ii)
It is an educational approach that is
directed at personal growth and personal liberalization from limiting
circumstances of life.
(iii)
Reflection and action, inherent in
creativity is bound to produce a human response that is adequate and adaptive
to the reality of a situation.
(iv)
Human beings are usually actors,
producers, creators and workers. An approach which seeks to equip them
appropriately is welcome.
(v)
It tends to promote critical thinking
and activity oriented learning process.
(vi)
It enhances the independence of mind,
thought and action leading to autonomy.
(vii)
Allows for the exploration of self in
connection with inherent potentialities.
(viii)
It helps the learner to realize that
he/she is a task/project, - not yet complete – open ended being who can
transform himself as he reconstructs the environment.
(ix)
It promotes self esteem, self
expression, self determination, self reliance etc.
Revision
question
Examine
the critical role of creativity in education showing how it can be incorporated
in the process of education.
(b)
Education and Human Consciousness
The term consciousness
is derived from the Latin verb ‘consicite’ where sicite means to know. It is an
activity of the mind which involves awareness, feeling, perception and
knowledge. In essence, consciousness involves two aspects:
·
The subject person who is knowing.
·
The object being known.
Being conscious always
implies being aware of something. When one is conscious of something, they
direct their intellectual/mental attention to either something outside
themselves; to the subject of their
attention or to themselves introspectively i.e. in this process, one makes themselves
actively present to it. They come into contact with it.
Levels
of Consciousness
There are four levels
of consciousness:
(i) Empirical
consciousness
This is the lowest
level of awareness where man experiences things empirically through senses.
This level of consciousness is also shared with animals, even plants that may
be said to be conscious of the environment. It is also a level of
pre-reflection common to children.
(ii)Intellectual
consciousness
This is the second
stage of consciousness. It is a stage of concept formation where the mind
develops ability to identify things, to name them. It is a stage of
construction as opposed to concrete awareness. Concepts like table, chair etc
begin to form in the mind.
(iii)Rational
consciousness
Here the process of
reasoning begins. An individual begins to make judgements based on values/norms
of society. Conformity to societal norms sets in.
(iv)Responsible
consciousness
The level is also
called critical consciousness. It involves the ability to make judgement about
the world (phenomena) and react to it in critical turmoil. Critical reflection involves
questioning the norms, routine of things. It transcends the known strives to
bring novelty, new approaches to doing things. Each stage of consciousness is
essential for every individual. In teaching/learning environment, it is important
to develop all the four stages/levels of awareness. The ultimate aim of
education ought to be attainment of responsible conscious news. Where an
individual attains this level, one discovers that they are limited in many
ways; that there exists inhibitions along one’s development.
Revision question
To what extent does the process of education
in Kenya fulfill the attainment of the four levels of consciousness?
(iv) EDUCATION AS A
SOCIAL PHENOMENON: THE DIALOGICAL DIMENSION OF EDUCATION
The term dialogue is
derived from the Greek words ‘dia’ and ‘logos’ meaning communication or
speaking words between two or more people. It is a moment where humans meet to
reflect on their reality as they make and remake it. Education as a dialogue proposes
a middle-ground approach between the traditional approach and the progressive
approach to education. It attempts to bridge the gap between transmission and socialization,
prevalent in traditional view and liberation and individualization emphasized
by Progressivists. Proponents of dialogue observe that both views fail to
address the basic meaning of human existence which is co-existence.
This means that there
should be no polarity between the individual and the society rather, both the
society and the individual need to be catered for in education. Education ought
to develop knowledge and understanding in ways that are consistent with the
society’s values as well as the development of one’s personality; individual.
Dialogue entails mutual agreement, mutual respect and understanding between
individual and society. It encourages the process of speaking to each other.
The teacher (representing society) and the learner ought to be involved in
dialogue during their activities.
The basis of the
teacher learner relationship ought to be realization that the learner is a human
being who has a right to exist and to express himself/herself. Dialogue requires
the teacher and the learner to encounter each other as equals, each of them playing
an essential role as far as education is concerned. Based on this equality,
education should be seen as a process of communication. This aspect rules out
methods and procedures of monologue which destroy the realization of a
fulfilling education. Monologue constitutes an assault on the consciousness of
the other, rendering it silent, passive etc. Dialogue makes education to be
inter-subjective: a process involving encounter, participation. Education as
dialogue rules out authoritarian approaches by the teacher i.e. force and
corporal punishment. Such measures make students to be docile and submissive.
It also rules out the alleviation
of the learner above the teacher as advocated by the progressive movement. This
is because doing so reduces the educating environment into a chaotic
atmosphere. The teacher should not abdicate his position as an adult, but
should exercise his/her role with care and concern, be humane to the learners.
This will motivate them to seek after, to explore and inquire into knowledge
under the caring guidance of the teacher. Essentially, dialogue is a democratic
communication. It affirms the freedom of the participants to make and remake
their culture in many ways.
·
Dialogue puts the object to be known between
the two subjects of knowing. They meet around it and through it for mutual
inquiry.
·
The educator/teacher normally has prior
contact with the object to be known. It is he who presents it to the class for
learners to discuss. However, the teacher’s prior knowledge of the object does
not mean that he/she has exhausted all dimensions of the object.
· It
is required that the teacher relearns to avoid transferring knowledge statically
as a fixed possession of the teacher; dialogue demands a dynamic approximation
towards the object.
·
Dialogue does not mean that everyone in
class must say something even if they have nothing to say. It only sustains a
level of freedom for any learner who may want to say something.
·
Dialogue requires that the starting point
of learning be ordinary experiences of reality.
·
There should be no dichotomy between
reality and the content of study. Conceptualize knowledge as much as possible.
·
Teaching should be conversational;
moderate your voice accordingly.
·
Making learning task oriented – problem
based.
·
Teacher must be able to grasp the
learner’s entry behaviour in terms of their critical level of cognition, literacy
and vocabulary, political and social ideas they possess.
·
The words used ought to be familiar –
clarity of words will result into clarity of thought hence effective
communication.
Revision question
Assess the role of dialogue in education.
PHILOSOPHICAL
THOUGHT AND EDUCATION
(I)
IDEALISM
AND EDUCATION
Definition and
meaning of Idealism
The main tenant of idealism is that
ideas and knowledge are the truest reality. Many
things in the world change, but ideas and knowledge are enduring. Idealism was often referred to as “idea-ism”.
Idealists believe that ideas can change
lives. The most important part of a person is the mind. It is to be nourished and developed.
Idealist Ideas. Proponents include: Socrates,
Plato, Descartes, Kant, Hegel and Royce
Bishop George Berkeley etc.
Aims of Education
o
The purpose of
education is to contribute to the development of the mind and self of the learner.
o
It emphasizes intellectual activities, moral judgments, aesthetic judgments,
self-realization, individual freedom,
individual responsibility, and self-control in order to achieve this development.
Education outcome: a literate person with good moral character
in order to
better serve society.
·
The school has a responsibility to
find and to train future leaders
·
Education should
maintain and
transmit of the established values of
the past
The Concept of
Student
·
The Idealistic pupil is characterized by that admirable
trait, the will to perfection. Whatever he
does, he does as well as he can.
·
He is
ambitious to deserve honors in scholarship.
·
He wants to grow
in knowledge and wisdom, to appreciate the aesthetic
things in life to deserve approbation, and to be a worthy person.
·
He strives
for perfection because the ideal person is perfect.
The Concept of
Teacher
·
The teacher
must be excellent, in order to serve as an example for the
student, both intellectually and morally.
·
Is the most
important element in the school to train learners on perfection.
·
Excel in knowledge and in human insight into the needs and
capacities of the learner.
·
Demonstrates moral excellence in
personal conduct and convictions.
·
Exercises great creative skill in providing opportunities for the learners' minds
to discover, analyze, unify, synthesize
and create applications of knowledge to life and behavior.
·
Serves as a
living ideal model for the student by teaching through example and guidance the lifelong habits of patience, tolerance and
perseverance towards a goal. He thus represents, to some degree, what the student can become.
·
In teaching, teacher’s role is to be a skillful questioner who encourages
students to think and ask more questions in an environment that is suitable
for learning.
The curriculum
·
The ideal curriculum teaches
children to think.
·
Teachers
should help students to explore texts for ideas about the purposes of life, family the nature of
peer pressures, and the problems of growing up.
·
Idealists believe that ideas can
change lives: classical literature, history and biographies can be used and
explored to help solve problems in today’s world.
·
Ideal curriculum selects subject matter that deals with ideal man and ideal
society: subjects essential for the realization of mental and moral
development.
·
Idealist’s rely on the world of the
mind; their curriculum has little contact with the experiential universe
characterized by field trips and
empirical or sensory data.
·
As the
curricular emphasis is subject matter of mind: literature, history, philosophy, and religion.
Instructional
Methodology
·
All thinking
begins with a thesis (opinion) where all points of view are looked at.
·
It’s a dialectic, a process where
ideas are put into battle against each other, with the most significant idea
winning the battle.
·
At the end of
the discussion, the ideas or opinions will begin to synthesize as they
work closer to truth.
·
Knowledge can be
attained through skillful questioning.
·
Idealist
education involves teaching the whole rather
than its parts.
·
The idealist is
not concerned with turning out students with technical skills but to have a
broad view and understanding of the world in which they live.
·
Idealism
emphasizes the role of the teacher, a skillful questioner
·
The lecture method in an idealist’s education system, it is
considered more of a way to convey
information and to help students comprehend ideas.
·
Idealists thus
prefer project based learning as a
form self directed learning activity where learning can occur without a teacher’s presence.
·
Teaching methods
focus on handling ideas through lecture, discussion, and Socratic dialogue (a method of
teaching that uses questioning to
help students discover and clarify knowledge).
· Imitation should be of some exemplary person or persons who by their behavior give
evidence that they are close to the nature
of reality.
Common criticisms of this philosophical
school.
1.
Sets
Unobtainable Goals: if perfection is unreachable there is very little desire on the part of most to become perfect.
2.
Ignores the Physical Self: The body cannot be ignored. To try to separate mental activity from the physical and to
try to place Ideas in a realm unrelated to the existent world becomes nothing more than an exercise in futility.
3.
Deemphasizes Experience:
Many ideas cannot have meaning apart
from experience: to deny the validity of this experience is to make
the universe sterile.
4.
Leads to Totalitarianism: Some of the critiques of idealism is that is discourages the
progress of science and our modern discovery.
5.
Emphasizes
Humanities: humanities oriented outlook, may lead
to a rejection of the whole concept of a
technological society which is mechanistic
and “scientifically” oriented.
6.
Overlooks possibility of Error: it fails to take into account the possibility that it may be
in error. This is especially true of idealism since its truth is immutable and
unchanging.
(II)
REALISM
AND EDUCATION
According to Realism,
the external world of objects is not imaginary. It really exists, "Our
experience is not independent but determines reaction to the external objects.
Experiences are influenced by the external world which has real existence.
According o realists, the external world is a solid Reality, whether known or
unknown to man. Reality is already in existence and in the invention of man. It
exists independently of being known to perceive by, or related to mind. Man can
only comprehend it, through senses. One should dip below the surface to know
the reality. Proponents include: Mills, Comenius, Russel, Locke, Rouseau etc. Realism
believes that, the individual doesn't make reality, he only discovers it. Its
main tenets (beliefs) are:
·
Realism believes in
the world which we see of perceive to be real.
·
Realists believe in
the present life.
·
They believe that the truth of life and aim of
life are in the development from the present unsystematic life.
·
Knowledge is real and
can be assimilated by the human beings.
·
The realists
distinguish between ‘appearance' and ‘reality'.
·
Realism believes that
there is an objective reality apart from that which is presented to the
consciousness.
Realism and Aims of
Education
·
Realists do not
believe in general and common aims of education. The aim of education should be
to teach truth rather than beauty, to understand the present practical life.
·
The purpose of
education, is to prepare the practical man of the world.
·
Neo-realists aim at
developing all round development of the objects with the development of their
organs.
Realism and
Curricula
·
Classical literature
should be studied: not study its form and style but, its content and ideas
contained.
·
Essential subject from
ancient times: natural sciences and contemporary social life and on humanistic
feelings including subjects like physics and psychology, sociology, economics,
Ethics, Politics, history, Geography, agriculture varied arts, languages.
Realism and methods of
teaching
- Education should proceed from simple to complex and
from concrete to abstract.
- Things before rules and words.
- Students to be taught to analyze rather than to
construct.
- Vernacular to be the medium of instruction.
- The order of nature to be sought and followed.
During teaching, realists argue that:
- Repetition is necessary for
retention.
- Individual's experience and
spirit of inquiry is more important than authority.
- No unintelligent cramming. More
emphasis on questioning and understanding.
- Methods of scientific thinking
(Inductive).
- Method of travel of journey
method – field trips (give real experience of varied aspects of life improve
knowledge and mental faculties).
Realism and the
Teacher
·
A teacher should be
such that he himself is educated and well versed with the customs of belief and
rights and duties of people, and the trends of all ages and places.
·
He must have full
mastery of the knowledge of present life.
·
He must guide the student towards the hard
realities of life. He is neither pessimist, nor optimist.
·
He must be able to
expose children to the problems of life and the world around.
A teacher should
always keep in mind-
- Re-capitulation is necessary to
make the knowledge permanent.
- One subject should be
taught at one time.
- No pressure or coercion be
brought upon the child.
- The practice of cramming should
be given up.
- The uniformity should be the
basic principle in all things.
- Things should be introduced
first and then the words.
- The entire knowledge should be
gained after experience.
- The knowledge should be
imparted on the basis of organs.
- Straight forward method should
be adopted for teaching.
- There should be a co-relation between
utility in daily life and education.
- The child should be told the utility of
whatever is taught.
- The simple rules should be defined.
- All the subjects should be
taught in proper order.
- Various organs of education
should be taught in chronological order.
- The topic should not be given
up unless the students understand it well.
- To find out the interest of the
child and to teach accordingly.
Realism and the child
·
Realism in education
recognizes the importance of the child. The child is a real unit which has real
existence. He has some feelings, some desires and some powers.
·
Child can reach near
reality through learning by reason.
·
Child has to be given
as much freedom as possible.
·
The child is to be
enabled to proceed on the basis of facts.
·
The child can learn
only when he follows the laws of learning.
·
The child is to be understood a creature of
the real world there is no sense in making him a God (perfect). He has to
be trained to become human.
Realism and school
organization
1.
School organization
would be based on the real needs of society. It should be established d at a
place where it is not needed.
2.
The opening of science
classes in every school is must. Only academic and literary subjects are not
sufficient to fulfill the needs of the society.
3.
Realism doesn't oppose
co-education. Sex-drive is a real feeling. It is a natural happening so it cannot
be rejected.
4.
School is the mirror
of the society. It is a miniature form of society and it presents the real
picture of the society
Realism and discipline
·
Discipline is
adjustment to objectivity. It is necessary in order to enable the child to
adjust himself to his environment and concentrate on his work.
·
A disciplined student
is one who does not withdraw from the cruelties, tyrannies, hardships and
shortcomings pervading the world. Realism has vehemently opposed withdrawal
from life. One has to adjust oneself to this material world.
Dark side of
realism
·
Realism recognizes the
real existence of the material world. This recognition remains an objected to
unless he says that only material world really exists.
·
The realist claims to
be objective. Objectivity in knowledge is nothing but the partnership of
personal knowledge. Knowledge is always subjective.
·
The realist recognizes
the origin of knowledge from the datum achieved by senses and asserts that only
objects are main and it is through their contact that knowledge is acquired.
·
The realist does not
accept the existence of transcendental (not based on experience or reason)
being.
·
Realism admits real feelings and needs of life
on the one hand, gives no place to imagination and sentiment, on the other.
·
The realist is
satisfied simply by the fulfillment of the needs of daily life and be does not
care to make life sublime.
(III)
PRAGMATISM
AND EDUCATION
Definition of
Pragmatism
Pragmatic means dealing
with matters according to their practical significance or immediate importance.
Means doctrine that evaluates any assertion solely by its practical
consequences and its bearing on human interests. The origin is Greek ‘pragma’
meaning ‘use. Pragmatic theory states that, truth can be known only through its
practical consequences and is thus and individual or a social matter rather
than an absolute. Its major proponent is John Dewey.
Educational Aims of
pragmatism
·
Pragmatists believe that the aims are
always determined by individual not by any organization or any structure.
·
The aim for education is to teach
children to be comfortable in their learning environment: the environment is
not a preparation for life but life. Educators should thus know the things that
motivate and interest children and plan accordingly.
·
Helping of the child to develop in such
a way as to contribute to his continued growth.
Three
characteristics of good educational aims by John Dewey:
1.
An educational aim must be founded upon the intrinsic activates and needs
(including original instinct and acquired habits) of the given individual to be
educated.
2. An aim must be capable of translation into
a method of cooperation with the activities of those
undergoing instruction.
3. Educators have to be on their
guard against ends that are alleged to be general and ultimate. Pragmatists
sole aim in education is to provide the
conditions that make growth possible.
The concept of Student
·
The student is an experiencing organism
capable of using intelligence to resolve its problems. As a thinking organism
his experiences, and his reflections upon those experiences become a part
of him determining his likes, dislikes, and the future direction of his
learning.
·
The student is a whole organism
constantly interacting with the environment. The school is both a part of this
environment and a special manmade environment designed to provide the best
possible educative experience to the learner.
·
The whole organism which is the child
consists of the biological child, the psychological child, and the social
child. The experiencing organism that is the learner brings to school with him
all the meanings, values, and experiences that constitute his personality: his self.
The concept of Teacher
·
The role of the teacher is important in
successfully educating children.
·
The teacher must capture the child’s
interest and build on the natural motivation that exists.
·
Teachers need to vary their teaching
methods to accommodate each individual learning style because not all children
learn at the same pace or are at the same point.
·
Teacher should organize knowledge and
relate it to current experiences.
·
The teacher, for the pragmatist, is a
member of the learning group who serves in the capacity of helper, guide, and
arranger of experiences. He is as involved in the educative process as are this
students.
·
The pragmatic teacher does not abdicate
responsibility. Uses child centered approach not lasses faire (free style)
·
The teacher is responsible for wiring
with the students and helping them develop their own projects that arise out of the felt needs of the students
rather than those of the teacher.
Curriculum
Framework
·
Any educative experience is the subject
matter of the pragmatists curriculum: any experience contributing to
growth.
·
The curriculum is learner- centered. In
changes and shifts as the needs of the learners vary.
·
Pragmatists see subject
matter as an arbitrary and wasteful system to which all learners have been
forced to conform. They rejects this system in order to center the subject
matter on the problems and needs of the learner.
Instructional
Methodology
·
Methods range from almost complete
laissez- the relatively structured.
·
The project method is the most common.
·
Classroom discussion in a free and open
atmosphere is encouraged, as well as individual problem solving research.
All of this may well involve a tremendous amount of reading, studying, and
traditional subject matter mastery.
·
The curriculum for the pragmatic philosophy
supports a connection between knowledge and experience. It is important for
children to connect the two so learning can become meaningful.
·
Pragmatic method is rooted in the
psychological needs of the students rather than in the logical order of
the subject matter.
·
The teacher will as
well as possible help the learners at each stage of the effort:
(i) to initiate the activity (to form or choose the purpose); (ii) to plan how
to carry the activity forward, (iii) to execute to plan: (iv) to evaluate
progress during the activity and the result at the end. While all this is going
forward the teacher will also (v) encourage the learners to think up and note
suggestions or new leads for other and further work; (vi) help them to
formulate these suggestions both for clarification of thinking and for
later recall and possible use (perhaps writing them in a book or on the board
for future reference); (vii) help pupils criticize their thinking en route
or at the close, as may seen wise; and finally (viii) look back over the
whole process to pick up and fix important kinds of learning as well as draw
lessons for the future from both successes and failures.
Criticism to pragmatism
1.
Weak Ontology: the whole structure of the pragmatic position
is relatively unstable due to its lack of a sound ontological base.
2.
Anti-Intellectualism:
the main area of concern for pragmatists is the marketplace of daily life thus
not rationalistic.
3.
Theory of Truth: all
other major philosophical systems are concerned with the nature of truth, but
pragmatism challenges the existence of this core making it a dangerous and
radical philosophy.
4.
School as Instrument of Social Change: Traditionally
the school has been viewed as society’s
instrument for the preservation and continuation of our cultural
heritage but pragmatists argue that, the school and the whole process of
education should be an instrument of social change and social
PART
THREE
CONTEMPORARY THEMES IN PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
I HUMAN RIGHTS AND
EDUCATION
Amnesty
International defines Human Rights Education (HRE) as a process whereby people
learn about their rights and the rights of others, within a framework of
participatory and interactive learning.
·
HRE
is concerned with changing attitudes and behaviour, learning new skills, and
promoting the exchange of knowledge and information.
·
HRE
is long-term, and aims to provide an understanding of the issues and equip
people with the skills to articulate their rights and communicate this
knowledge to others.
·
HRE
includes a varied range of innovative and effective education programs in the
formal, informal and non-formal sectors.
·
It
recognizes the universality and indivisibility of human rights;
o
increases
knowledge and understanding of human rights;
o
empowers people to claim their rights; assists
people to use the legal instruments designed to protect human rights;
o
uses
interactive and participatory methodology to develop attitudes of respect for
human rights;
o
develops
the skills needed to defend human rights; integrates the principles of human
rights into everyday life;
o
creates
a space for dialogue and change;
o
encourages
respect and tolerance.
There are two main
aspects to the relationship between human rights and education. In one sense
the denial of education has in
itself come to be seen as the violation of a basic human right and a synonym
for disempowerment. The other has to do with the content of the curriculum and
the extent to which it possesses a human
rights orientation.
According to the UN declaration
on education as a human right:
“
|
States
should strive to eradicate illiteracy
and should direct education toward the full development of the human
personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and
fundamental freedoms. The World Conference on Human Rights calls on all
States and institutions to include human rights, humanitarian law,
democracy
and rule of law as subjects in
curricula of all learning institutions in formal and non- formal settings.
Human rights education should include peace, democracy, development and social justice,
as set forth in international and regional human rights instruments, in order
to achieve common understanding and awareness with a view to strengthening
universal commitment to human rights.
|
”
|
—Paragraph
79 and 80, section 2 of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action
|
UNESCO has a responsibility to promote human rights education,
and was a key organizer of the UN's Decade for Human Rights Education (1995 –
2004) UNESCO attempts to promote human rights education through:
- Development of national and
local capacities for human rights education, through its co-operation in development
projects and programmes at national and sub-regional levels.
- Elaboration of learning
materials and publications and their translation and adaptation in
national and local languages.
- Advocacy and Networking
Activities.
Schools
offer human rights education as part of their curriculum. Content in this education includes:
·
The
theory of human rights.
·
The
practice of human rights.
·
Contemporary
human rights issues.
This
curriculum can take either formal, informal or non formal approach. Delivery of
the content will use of the following approaches:
1.
The Perceptual Approach
The learning of human rights ideas through formal
teaching/learning situation. This approach may have three forms:
(a) Human rights training as a subject: This may be
offered as a course in the school curriculum. Time is set aside on the formal
school timetable during which students are given adequate factual knowledge on
human rights. Through theory practice and field visits or excursions students
are taught the virtues of good human rights. Teaching is followed by exams.
(b) Human rights training through social studies
curriculum. The subject of Social Studies should introduce students to the
political, economic and social life of their community. It imparts on the
learners knowledge on the values and activities that we cherish as a society.
(c) Human rights education through all the subjects of the
curriculum. All the subjects should provide an opportunity for the content
training.
2. The Exemplary
Approach
- human rights training through observation, imitation
and role modelling.
- This may be informal – (believed that what we learn
informally tends to persist more than what we learn under normal
circumstances).
- Members within the immediate environment of learners
should set good examples to be emulated – should be beyond reproach. (Do as I
say not as I do): Are our teachers good role models? Why? Salary, Poor living
conditions e.t.c No one wants to be a teacher. (Being a teacher as condemnation
to poverty and moral depravity).
3. The Experiential
Approach
- Based on theory of Experience as the best teacher.
- Expose students to opportunities for active and
responsible participation in school and community affairs.
- Positive attitudes and essential skills are learnt
through participation.
- In school, provide a wide range of activities which
encourage working in groups and social interaction.
QUALITY EDUCATION
The changing
definition of quality education as reading, writing and arithmetic has been
expanded to address new challenges such as relevance, universal values, peace
and security and informed decision-making. In this context, quality education
has to be based on a human rights approach, as well as address areas including,
but not limited to, cultural diversity, multilingualism in education, peace and
non-violence, sustainable development and life skills. (UNESCO: Human Rights
Education). Human rights are designed to protect the less powerful from the
whims and caprices of the mighty. They provide protections that have been
judged to work to make societies more equitable, peaceful, and stable
Possible
challenges in teaching human rights education
·
Factual
inaccuracies and insensitivity to the existing religious, ethnic and cultural
diversity of the nation
·
Perspectives
that encourage bigotry, prejudice and discrimination towards fellow citizens,
especially women, and religious minorities and other nations.
·
Omission
of concepts and material that could encourage critical self-awareness among
students.
Schools
must respect human rights by allowing the students the three great freedoms:
freedom of choice, freedom of action and freedom to bear the results of action
– that constitute personal responsibility.
Revision question
1
The changing
definition of quality education as reading, writing and arithmetic has been
expanded to address new challenges such as relevance, universal values, peace
and security and informed decision-making. How are these challenges being
addressed in the education system today?
2
To what extent has the content on human rights
education been integrated and infused in the Primary school curriculum?
3
“The denial of education and selective inclusion of human
rights content in the school curriculum
amounts to human right abuse as far as education is concerned”. Discuss.
II EDUCATION AND DEMOCRACY
(JOHN DEWEY:
OCTOBER 20, 1859 – JUNE 1, 1952)
He was an American philosopher, psychologist
and educational
reformer whose ideas have been influential in education and social
reform. Dewey was an important early developer of the philosophy of pragmatism
and one of the founders of functional psychology. He was a major
representative of the progressive and progressive populist
philosophies of schooling during the first half of the 20th century in the USA.
In his advocacy of democracy, Dewey considered
two fundamental elements—schools and civil society—as
being major topics needing attention and reconstruction to encourage
experimental intelligence and plurality. Dewey asserted that:
·
Complete democracy was to be obtained not just
by extending voting rights but also by ensuring that there
exists a fully formed public opinion, accomplished by effective
communication among citizens, experts, and politicians, with the latter being
accountable for the policies they adopt.
·
"Democracy and the one, ultimate, ethical
ideal of humanity are to my mind synonymous."
·
Education and learning are social and
interactive processes, and thus the school itself is a social institution
through which social reform can and should take place.
·
Students thrive in an environment where they are
allowed to experience and interact with the curriculum, and all students should
have the opportunity to take part in their own learning.
·
The importance of education is not only as a
place to gain content knowledge, but also as a place to learn how to live.
·
The purpose of education should not revolve
around the acquisition of a pre-determined set of skills, but rather the
realization of one’s full potential and the ability to use those skills for the
greater good.
·
To prepare one for the future life means to give
him command of himself; it means so to train him that he will have the full and
ready use of all his capacities.
·
Education and schooling are instrumental in
creating social change and reform. Education is a regulation of the process of
coming to share in the social consciousness; and that the adjustment of
individual activity on the basis of this social consciousness is the only sure
method of social reconstruction.
·
On educational pedagogy, Dewey argues that the
major flaw in this methodology is the inactivity of the student; within this
particular framework, "the child is simply the immature being who is to be
matured; he is the superficial being who is to be deepened" .
·
For education to be most effective, content must
be presented in a way that allows the student to relate the information to
prior experiences, thus deepening the connection with this new knowledge.
·
Too much reliance on the child could be equally
detrimental to the learning process. Dewey advocated for an educational
structure that strikes a balance between delivering knowledge while also taking
into account the interests and experiences of the student.
·
The present standpoint of the child and the
facts and truths of studies define instruction. Dewey became one of the most
famous proponents of hands-on learning or experiential education, arguing that
"if knowledge comes from the impressions made upon us by natural objects,
it is impossible to procure knowledge without the use of objects which impress
the mind"
·
Many researchers even credit him with the
influence of Project Based Learning (PBL) which places
students in the active role of researchers.
·
The role that the teacher should play within
that process: one should not be one to stand at the front of the room doling
out bits of information to be absorbed by passive students. Instead, the
teacher’s role should be that of facilitator and guide. “The teacher is not in
the school to impose certain ideas or to form certain habits in the child, but
is there as a member of the community to select the influences which shall
affect the child and to assist him in properly responding to these influences”.
·
Thus the teacher becomes a partner in the
learning process, guiding students to independently discover meaning within the
subject area. This philosophy has become an increasingly popular idea within
present-day teacher preparatory programs.
Revision
questions
1
John Dewey’s
ideas are not practical in view of the overloaded 8 4 4 syllabus. Discuss.
2
Critique the
recent government policy on democratic school governance that seeks to abolish the
prefect system in favour of the student council system by August 2012.
III LEARNING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY AND BEYOND
(A) GENERAL OUTLOOK
Excerpts from a report from a new public-private
coalition known as the Partnership for 21st Century Skills articulates a vision
of how schools can best prepare students to succeed in the first decades of the
21st century. Central to the report's recommendations is a call for schools to
focus on six key elements of 21st century learning:
1.
Core
Subjects: The importance of the core subjects
identified in any education system. The challenge here is for schools and
policymakers to expand their focus beyond "basic competency" to
understanding the core academic content at much higher levels.
2.
Learning
Skills: They need to know how to use their
knowledge and skills-by thinking critically, applying knowledge to new
situations, analyzing information, comprehending new ideas, communicating,
collaborating, solving problems, and making decisions."
3.
21st
Century Tools: Recognizing that "technology
is, and will continue to be, a driving force in workplaces, communities, and
personal lives in the 21st century," Emphasis should be on the importance
of incorporating information and communication technologies into education from
the elementary grades upwards.
4.
21st
Century Context: should cover experiences that are
relevant to students' lives, connected with the world beyond the classroom, and
based on authentic projects.
5.
21st Century Content:
The report's authors believe that certain content essential for preparing
students to live and work in a 21st century world is missing from many state
and local standards (elaborated later here).
6.
New Assessments
that Measure 21st Century Skills:
today’s assessment remains an emerging and challenging field that demands
further study and innovation. Recommendations include moving beyond
standardized testing as the sole measure of student learning; balancing
traditional tests with classroom assessments to measure the full range of
students' skills; and using technology-based assessments to deliver immediate
feedback.
21st Century
Learning Skills and ICT Literacy
(a) Information
and communication technology literacy
- Thinking and problem-solving
skills
- Critical thinking and systems
thinking
- Problem identification,
formulation, and solution
- Creativity and intellectual
curiosity
Using problem-solving tools (such as spreadsheets,
decision support, and design tools) to manage complexity, solve problems, and
think critically, creatively, and systematically.
(b) Information
and communication skills
- Information and media literacy
skills
- Communication skills
Using communication, information processing, and
research tools (such as word processing, e-mail, groupware, presentation
software, and the Internet) to access, manage, integrate, evaluate, create, and
communicate information.
(c) Interpersonal
and self-direction skills
- Interpersonal and collaborative
skills
- Self-direction
- Accountability and adaptability
- Social responsibility
Using personal development and productivity tools
(such as e-learning, time managers, and collaboration tools) to enhance
productivity and personal development.
21st Century
Content
(i)
Global awareness
- Using 21st century skills to
understand and address global issues
- Learning from and working
collaboratively with individuals representing diverse cultures, religions,
and lifestyles in a spirit of mutual respect and open dialogue in
personal, work, and community contexts
- Promoting the study of
languages other than English as a tool for understanding other nations and
cultures
(ii)
Financial,
economic, and business literacy
- Knowing how to make appropriate
personal economic choices
- Understanding the role of the
economy and the role of business in the economy
- Applying appropriate 21st
century skills to function as a productive contributor within an
organizational setting
- Integrating oneself within and
adapting continually to our nation's evolving economic and business
environment
(iii)
Civic literacy
- Being an informed citizen to
participate effectively in government
- Exercising the rights and
obligations of citizenship at local, state, national, and global levels
- Understanding the local and
global implications of civic decisions
- Applying 21st century skills to
make intelligent choices as a citizen
Lifelong
learning is now recognized by educators, governing bodies, accreditation
organizations, certification boards, employers, third-party payers, and the
general public as one of the most important competencies that people must
possess. Promoting lifelong learning as continuous, collaborative,
self-directed, active, broad in domain, everlasting, positive and fulfilling,
and applicable to one’s profession as well as all aspects of one’s life has
emerged as a major global educational challenge. Meeting this challenge will
require changes in the way teachers teach and learners learn, as teachers take
on a more facilitative role and learners take more responsibility for setting
goals, identifying resources for learning, and reflecting on and evaluating
their learning. Malcolm S. Knowles, is the “father of adult learning”.
Lifelong Learning: A Definition
defined
lifelong learning as “a continuously supportive process which stimulates and
empowers individuals...to acquire all the knowledge, values, skills and
understanding they will require throughout their lifetimes...and to apply them
with confidence, creativity, and enjoyment in all roles, circumstances, and
environments.”
This
definition emphasizes lifelong learning as (a) continuous (it never
stops); (b) supportive (it isn’t done alone); (c) stimulating and
empowering (it’s self-directed and active, not passive); (d)
incorporating knowledge, values, skills, and understanding (it’s more than
what we know); (e) spanning a lifetime (it happens from our first
breath to our last); (f) applied (it’s not just for knowledge’s sake);
(g) incorporating confidence, creativity, and enjoyment (it’s a
positive, fulfilling experience); and (h) inclusive of all roles,
circumstances, and environments (it applies not only to our chosen
profession, but to our entire life) (4).
Lifelong Learning and Traditional Learning
Lifelong
learning is more than adult education, which often is restricted to providing
people with opportunities to engage in (school-like) learning activities during
their adult life.
·
The challenge for lifelong learning is to fundamentally rethink
learning, teaching, and education for the information age in an attempt to
change mind-sets.
·
Lifelong learning involves
and engages learners of all ages in acquiring and applying knowledge and skills
in the context of authentic, self-directed problems.
·
By integrating working and learning, people learn within the
context of their work on real-world problems.
·
The learner’s involvement in goals setting is a prerequisite to
motivated and self-regulated learning. Goal setting implies the personal
commitment of the learner and is an integral part of learning in life.
·
In traditional learning, the goals are fixed and predetermined,
providing students with little or no chance of involvement.
·
Traditional learning tends to motivate by extrinsic rewards, such
as praise from the teacher or others, grades, or financial compensation. As a
result, students can develop a dependency on praise, leading to feelings of
insecurity and non-development of task motivation.
·
Learning flows from a variety of activities, for example,
observing how other people do something, discussing with others, asking
someone, looking up information, trying something for oneself and learning from
trial and error, and reflecting on all the previous activities.
·
The mental activities involved in learning may be divided into
four categories: (a) social interaction, (b) processing
verbal and other symbolic information, (c) direct experience, and (d)
reflection.
·
In real life, learners decide on the type of activities in which
to engage, often with input from others, but the final responsibility is with
the learner.
·
In traditional learning,
most of the regulating is done by the teacher and educational system. This
makes learning look like a neat, step-by-step procedure, from the beginning of
the book to the end, from the start of the program to the examination. Learning
processes in real life are much less predictable and straightforward.
Traits and Skills of Lifelong Learners
Lifelong
learning is largely self-directed learning, “a process in which learners take
the initiative, with the support and collaboration of others; for increasing
self- and social awareness; critically analyzing and reflecting on their
situations; diagnosing their learning needs with specific reference to
competencies they have helped identify; formulating socially and personally
relevant learning goals; identifying human and material resources for learning;
choosing and implementing appropriate learning strategies; and reflecting on
and evaluating their learning.” Steps to lifelong learning can be articulated
as:
(a) reflection,
(b) setting
goals,
(c) assessing
knowledge and skills,
(d) creating a
learning plan,
(e) putting
the plan into action, and
(f) evaluating
and refocusing...
An
individual’s learning potential and the development from novice to expert
depend on:
·
the development of expertise
in learning to learn (knowing what and how to learn),
·
having access to a relevant
knowledge base to build on, and
·
being motivated to learn.
Barriers to Lifelong Learning
Certain
obvious issues, such as lack of motivation, time, and adequate resources, can
interfere with an individual’s success as an independent adult learner. In
addition, more subtle problems, such as a lack of awareness of knowledge
deficit, personal reluctance to change, ambivalence (indecisiveness), and group
mentality, can also be significant barriers to positive educational change.
Promoting
lifelong learning as continuous, collaborative, self-directed, active, broad in
domain, everlasting, positive and fulfilling, and applicable to one’s
profession as well as all aspects of one’s life has emerged as a major global
educational challenge. Meeting this challenge will require changes in the way
teachers teach and learners learn, as teachers take on a more facilitative role
and learners take more responsibility for setting goals, identifying resources
for learning, and reflecting on and evaluating their learning.
Revision
Questions
1 Assess the extent to which our Primary
and Secondary schools are compliant with the requirements
of the 21st Century: refer to the content and learning skills.
2 Compare and contrast lifelong to trad